While the lab primarily focuses on research, it also engages in some advocacy efforts. To this point, those effects have focused on addressing socioeconomic inequities in higher education, particularly in the professoriate. Most of the people that researchers study are (relatively) poor, but study after study shows that most researchers come from (relatively) wealthy backgrounds. This imbalance leads to poorer conceptual, theoretical, and empirical work and we actively promote efforts to address it.
As part of these efforts, Charles Crabtree, the PI of the lab, worked with the American Political Science Association to change how it measured first-generation status in their annual surveys. Data from this new measure, which now aligns with United States government guidelines and measures used by other comparable academic associations, provides the best evidence for socioeconomic inequities in the discipline.
If political science faculty mirrored the socioeconomic makeup of the United States, we would expect that about 80% of faculty would be the first in their family to complete a four-year degree. If political science faculty mirrored the socioeconomic makeup of the world, we would expect that about 90% of faculty would be the first in their family to complete a four-year degree. According to APSA data, only about 24% of faculty are first-generation graduates. This representation gap, a delta of 56 or 66 percentage points depending on the point of comparison, represents the largest diversity shortfall in the field.
The figure to the right 👉 visualizes the situation using the United States as the benchmark geography for assessing representation. Each waffle square denotes 1 percentage point. The area in dark green denotes the current proportion of political science faculty who are firstgen college graduates, the area in light green denotes what the current could should be if the discipline were representative.
